LinkedIn Influence · Portcast
Company-level ad influence on CRM pipeline — matched by domain
Period: 3 Jan – 2 Jul 2026 (180d)
Pipeline: Sales Pipeline (NB, CS, Partner Combined)
LinkedIn Ads + HubSpot + Clay
Influenced pipeline/revenue count a deal only when the company had a LinkedIn touchpoint before the deal was created / closed. Air-cover = open deals whose company LinkedIn started advertising to after the deal already existed — nurture, not sourcing.
Attribution
Insights
Warm accounts
FF outreach list
| Company | Eng. level | Paid impr. | Paid eng. | Paid clicks | CTR | Deal | Influence | |
Only companies with a Sales-Pipeline deal are shown (LinkedIn-served accounts that entered pipeline). Click View activity for the per-campaign split and the month-by-month exposure timeline with deal-created / won / lost markers.
| Company | Eng. | Paid impr. | Paid clicks | CRM contacts | Last contacted | Lifecycle | Prospect |
Engaged companies with no Sales-Pipeline deal. Net-new (cold) = few CRM contacts, no recent outreach — real prospecting targets. Active in sales = already worked.
| Company | Name | Title | Email | Status |
Individuals at highly-engaged freight-forwarder accounts, matched to the job-title profile the ads target (ocean/air freight, operations, product, pricing, IT). Emails resolved via Clay. Rows marked In HubSpot already exist in your CRM and are excluded from the net-new count — the rest are ready for sales outreach. This is company→person inference from firmographic + title data, not confirmation a specific person saw the ad.